Welcome, Guest
Remember me

TOPIC:

How Big of a Role Do You See Intelligent Automation Playing in the Year Ahead? 1 year 10 months ago #6841

  • 's Avatar Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
This final question of 2018, how big of a role do you see intelligent automation playing in 2019?

Please Log in to join the conversation.

1 year 10 months ago #6842

  • 's Avatar
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
Deloitte has a good article on this - reading it might help to align responses to the Question.

www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/focus/s...a-of-innovation.html

Please Log in to join the conversation.

1 year 10 months ago #6843

  • 's Avatar
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
Intelligent Automation has been misused widely and is a fairly ambiguous term and possibly another buzzword. A few things are wrong with it. What kind of intelligence should it represent? Who supplies the intelligence? Does intelligent mean learning simple decisions? Learning rules or learning whole processes? What should it automate? People? Backend interactions? An add on to RPA? In complex environments (a.k.a. daily business interactions) machine learning has to be setup and pointed to well-behaved data sets. You need not only process experts and now data modeling expert but also ML experts. Bigger and more complex project to fail! Or invent a completely different kind of learning ...

I feel that in orthodox BPM systems ML has little to do and the business little to gain. We have had the User-Trained Agent for a long-time but customers did want it at most as a Best Next Action recommendation. We could train it to recognize whole processes, but it is difficult to learn decision thresholds from observing work. I guess the main issue is that the people involved in it do 'process thinking' and leaving anything undefined up to a machine to learn goes against the grain.

Diagrams constrain and hinder the process dynamics as it is incredibly complex to express typical business rules in a logic tree. If BPM does not enforce compliance, why bother? Intelligence can be applied once the whole paradigm of BPM is changed. And if that does not happen inside it will happen outside BPM.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

1 year 10 months ago #6844

  • 's Avatar
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
First, if we are talking about AI and 'learning' processes then we are dealing with a market that is still in its infancy. 2019 will be an important year to expand the footprint and learn how to leverage 'learning' and deploy in more parts of the business particularly in the customer touchpoints. However several factors- maturity of organizations, platforms, tools, implementation capabilities, approaches etc. - need to be ironed out for it to scale and play a big role thus the acceleration of AI and 'learning' processes to me are a few years away. There is just too many embedded platforms and organizational baggage to swing on a dime in 2019. Otherwise, the general term of intelligent automation, implying processes that are automated and have encapsulated business capabilities, is far and away past the tipping point. There are loads of intelligent automation processes imbedded in organizations that can processes without humans and cover many user scenarios thus prewired 'decisioning' drives the outcomes. But that means the processes have been wired for specific scenarios and decisions vs a process that 'learns' and changes on the fly. But we are near for true 'learning' intelligent automation.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

1 year 10 months ago #6845

  • 's Avatar
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
Some pundits define Intelligent Automation as automation with AI, for the sake of automation, for the sake of AI, or both.

I define Intelligent Automation as automation after proper understanding of machines' role in a process.

AI is misused on a global scale and appears to be the root password for daft VCs.

As the joke goes:
"Q: what is the difference between ML and AI?
A: ML is written in Python, AI is written in Powerpoint"

Happy New Year everyone! :D

Please Log in to join the conversation.

1 year 10 months ago #6846

  • 's Avatar
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
As Max, Stuart and Bogdan so rightfully state: AI, ML, Intelligent Automation are terms typically misused to hype up otherwise "boring" BPM topics and basically generate more sales for large consultants (such as Deloitte and the likes) or to justify yet another AI/ML start up.

My main concern with these concepts has everything to do with the fact that it only talks about the HOW and not the WHAT and WHY. Companies define their strategies based on the WHY (why are we in business, why are selling this product or service?) and these strategies are then translated into the WHAT (typically done by the management level in the company). Finally and ultimately we arrive at the HOW and this is were a lot of artificial, intelligent and automation things come in. The basically replace a number of human tasks, and that is good and I believe there will be a huge market potential for these kind of tools and concepts.

What I am missing in almost all articles on these topics is simply the link to the WHAT and the WHY and the former one being typically expressed in the form of end to end processes. Also the Deloitte article does not speak about the tie-in from the intelligent automation perspective into the business processes (which are the main core structure in the company). Until they (developers and manufacturers of AI, ML, IA etc) realize that all they do needs to support one or more business processes, it will remain a niche market in my opinion and as a result, their role will be rather marginal in 2019. Once they do realize this, their role will be much and much bigger.

Happy holidays and looking forward to exchanging more profound BPM topics in 2019!
Cheers,
Caspar

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Time to create page: 0.126 seconds