"Prebuilt models, templates and accelerators can help organizations save money and time by starting with these jump start components on top of a very adaptable engine that can change in near real time."
-Jim Sinur

From the BPM Forum

"Today, a better way though is to start from work for which an automation business case can be built, and then apply BPM process tools complemented by rules and algorithms. All-in, full court press. The technology is up to the challenge now, for all work patterns, including case."
-John Morris

"What is a mistake is deploying BPM and case separately. If you've got one platform for case and another for BPM—or even one product featuring dissimilar viewers, builders, or reporting for each model—you've made things harder than they have to be."
-E. Scott Menter

Is It More Important for a Process to Be Adaptive than Efficient? "First of all a process should be effective; delivering what you promise. And then the answer to the question is 'it depends'."
-Emiel Kelly

"With the modern rate of expected and unexpected changes it is practically impossible for a process to stay efficient and effective for some 'long' time (yet another factor of uncertainty). Thus a process must be adaptive to be easy adjusted."
-Dr. Alexander Samarin

Is It More Important for a Process to Be Adaptive than Efficient? "An adaptive process ultimately leads to efficiency gains. The reverse is not true."
-Bogdan Nafornita

"Efficiency is key to success. Adaptability just helps you stay efficient when 'ability to adapt' is the new longevity. I would pose that reliability may be more important than either."
-Amy Barth

"It doesn't make sense to use a BPMS that doesn't fully support unstructured and collaborative work patterns."
-John Reynolds

blog comments powered by Disqus

More articles from this author